US seeing implications of UAS roadmap
In accordance with the ‘US Army Roadmap for UAS 2010-2035’, the weaponising and ‘humanising’ of unmanned systems is 'no longer something of the future', according to a military official.
Speaking at the Defence IQ Military Robotics conference in London on 28 June, George Gonsalves, aviation systems analyst for unmanned aircraft for the US Army Capabilities Center, outlined the current trends and pressures the army has come across in implementing the roadmap.
He said that although autonomy is a hot topic for unmanned platforms, these systems are currently only 'enablers', and are not yet replacing soldiers.
'We're facing many challenges. We have not really seen many [systems] replacing the force structure yet but we are feeling the pressures to do so,' Gonsalves commented.
'Robotics exist to enable human activity. There's a lot of pressure for structure change. It doesn't do us any good to have billions of dollars worth of aircraft and sensors in the air if we can't get that data down to the point of the spirit that we're fighting on the ground.'
The emphasis at present is on procuring truly autonomous systems; however these do not come without implications, Gonsalves explained. There needs to be a seamless integration for the systems, they need to be trusted, and they need to be able to 'adapt to varying social cues and context'.
Although ‘humanising’ these platforms is advantageous, humans 'must be able to exert full control' over them, as an ethical issue arises with certain systems having the ability to kill.
While the roadmap outlines unmanned development for the US Army until 2035, Gonsalves warned that if it is not invested in now 'you'll never reach the end of the road map'.
The aim of the strategy between 2026 and 2035 is for the army to have an integrated system of systems, with universal commonality. However there is currently an 'unwillingness to reduce force structure'.
The army has 93 Shadow UAS platforms, but it aims to own 102. Each combat team has one, and the army is 'rewinging those Shadows' so they have a nine hour endurance, up from the four they currently have.
While the Wasp, Raven and Puma airborne platforms are also important systems for the army, Gonsalves revealed that it is struggling to develop a specific control system for ground robotics as the emphasis is on UAS. The army has developed its Unmanned Ground Systems Roadmap in response to this capability gap.
'Ground robotics, they're not as mature as unmanned aircraft systems right now. We only have one programme to record, and that's the SUG-V [Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle].'
He said there is 'friction right now' amidst pressure to support these systems, but it is 'realistic' that UGVs will be weaponised by the latter end of the roadmap.
Another pressure on the army is to introduce more VTOL platforms as they do not require a runway, although this comes at an extra cost.
More from Uncrewed Vehicles
-
AUSA 2024: Quantum-Systems targets big 2025 with UAS developments
Quantum-Systems has been upgrading its UAS family, with new versions of the Vector, Reliant and Twister drones set for release throughout 2025.
-
US Army accelerates acquisition and field of company-level sUAS
The service has been using a Directed Requirement (DR) approach to speed up the deployment of a Medium Range Reconnaissance capability.
-
AeroVironment to display eVTOL P550 at AUSA 2024
AeroVironment’s portfolio will grow thanks to the eVTOL P550 aimed at battalion-level tactical forces.
-
Australia’s air force aims its UAV fleet northwards
The Royal Australian Air Force is advancing its unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) capabilities across three key programmes as it works with the likes of Boeing and Northrop Grumman to reshape Australia’s defence strategy.
-
FTUAS competitor trials were “very successful”, says US Army official
Prototypes from Griffon Aerospace and Textron Systems recently passed through MOSA conformance trials and flight tests.
-
Pentagon adds Replicator 2 to budget request with focus on C-sUAS capabilities
Funds for the second phase of this effort will be allocated in the US Department of Defense (DoD) FY2026 budget request.