US Navy shipbuilding branded “too slow” and “too expensive” by acquisition chief
An artist’s impression of a Constellation-class frigate. (Image: US DoD)
The US’s naval shipbuilding regimen has been branded as both too slow and too expensive by Brett Seidle, the new acting acquisition chief of the US Navy (USN).
Seidle made the charges in prepared and written remarks to the House Armed Services seapower panel. They included that ship deliveries were between one-to-four years late and that the later they become the more costs spiral, often faster than the rate of inflation.
To balance out his observations, Seidle acknowledged: “These challenges are shared across the nuclear and conventional shipbuilding communities, with both navy and industry sharing responsibility.”
The idea of increasing delays and spiralling costs
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
Read this Article
Get access to this article with a Free Basic Account
- Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
- 2 free stories per week
- Daily news round-up email service
- Access to all Decisive Edge email newsletters
Unlimited Access
Access to all our premium news as a Premium News 365 Member. Corporate subscriptions available.
- Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
- 14-day free trial (cancel at any time)
- Unlimited access to all published premium news
More from Naval Warfare
-
Anduril awarded $642 million counter-drone contract with US Marine Corps
The contract will see counter-small uncrewed aerial systems (CsUAS) installed at bases, with the initial contract covering site survey and engineering services as well as some system procurement. Work is expected to be completed over the next ten years.
-
Navantia combat systems selected for Chinese-built Thai LPD
The landing platform dock, believed to be the largest naval vessel that China has exported, will see the Chinese-built vessel embrace Western technology.
-
Why USNORTHCOM would struggle to defeat China in the Arctic
Not having enough naval and C4ISR capabilities to patrol and monitor the region would the US at risk in a conflict with China in the Arctic region.