Why we need to radically rethink how we plan for a future of unprecedented technological change (Opinion)
Guard of honour greet a British delegation upon arrival at Japan's MoD Headquarters in Tokyo.
Brought to you in partnership with Fujitsu
In an era where technological advancements rapidly reshape the landscape of global security, Japan and the UK are vital partners.
Shared values, democracy, and adherence to the rule of law are foundational to the UK and Japan’s burgeoning partnership. Today, technology is vital to protecting those values and our systems while also posing profound challenges to them – social, political, economic, and military. As global partners, the UK and Japan will need a paradigm shift in how we incorporate technological advancements into our defence posture.
The pace of technological advancement is rapidly overtaking the pace of our political discourse and defence procurement cycles. Our efforts to integrate new technology and develop doctrines that harness it are ponderous and slow. We have this the wrong way around. Instead of catching up to the commercial technology sector, our modern militaries should first establish a comprehensive ‘theory of winning’ to inform our technology procurement needs.
The essence of this approach requires understanding the operational challenges to be faced on future battlefields and developing technologies that to meet the threat – too much of our R&D is following, not leading. A shared plan for how we will fight should be the foundation of a modern military partnership and an important part, for the UK and Japan, of how we fulfil the collective vision of the Hiroshima Accord.
![](/media/cache/images/redactor_uploads/2024/07/11/APOSEC-OFFICIAL-20231124-035-016.jpg.iCe4goHlMWATAA.GUYtE8K4Wf/1e67def9c179d6084b9e2e4d12551fda.jpg)
The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that compared to the late 18th and early 19th Century Industrial Revolution, change is now ten times faster, at 300 times the scale, with 3000 times the impact. Defence cannot keep up.
Neither spiral development nor faster procurement will be enough. My recommendations, a ‘Roper Rule’ (no programme over five years) and to ‘put your money where your strategy is’ (transfer 6% of the budget every year, by rule, to new capabilities) are necessary, but also not sufficient.
Establishing a comprehensive ‘theory of winning’ requires planning against constants, trends, and shifts; it requires imagination to anticipate, design, and build the technologies we need to win, rather than just agility in responding as technological change upends our plans again and again.
We need to start from square one, understanding the operational challenges in detail. All military revolutions have come from planning for specific conflicts, against a specific adversary, in a specific geography. Today’s will be no different.
Many technology firms have a limited understanding of how their systems are changing the character of warfare, while defence often finds itself reacting to breakthroughs, equally bewildered. We need to change this dynamic. A comprehensive theory of winning specific to anticipatable future conflict will need to be jointly developed.
![](/media/cache/images/redactor_uploads/2024/07/11/AHQCPL1-OFFICIAL-20240626-018-025/ad88beaed1f2a13859fe98ea47afb3b7.jpg)
The Hiroshima Accord, signed at the G7 Leaders Summit last year, commits the UK and Japan to ‘joint action’ and' a consistent and shared response’ to address the ‘impact of rapid technological development’ and to advance ‘the vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific.’ To better guide the UK and Japan's joint action, we need to think differently about the future of defence and, thus, of deterrence.
Technology is important, but it cannot be the guiding light. A theory of winning will be our best opportunity to harness the power of modern technology and deploy it effectively on the modern battlefield. It will see greater collaboration among global partners, strengthening our alliances and security apparatuses.
This is a blueprint for the future of defence, where strategic foresight and technological innovation go hand in hand. The theory of winning will ensure that our defence capabilities are not only advanced but also aligned with our ultimate objectives of security and stability in an unstable world.
Keith Dear is Managing Director of Fujitsu’s Centre for Cognitive and Advanced Technologies
To learn more, attend Keith Dear’s keynote address on Thursday, 25 July, at the Farnborough Airshow.
- 10:30 am on 25 July: The Theory of Winning: Transforming Defence with Technology that Does Not Exist
More from Farnborough Airshow 2024 (FIA2024) | View all news
-
Eurofighter looks to fly integrated new systems in Typhoon next year
The first representative Eurofighter Typhoon flew in 1994 and entered operational service in 2003. Two decades later the company is working to ensure the platform’s relevance beyond the middle of the century.
-
Embraer KC-390 puts on a show for the Mexican Air Force
The KC-390 demonstrator was en route to Brazil after a display at the Farnborough Airshow in the UK.
-
Israeli Air Force to receive first KC-46A aerial refuelling aircraft in May 2025
The delivery would mark an end to long delays in the programme with additional aircraft expected through to 2027.
-
Boeing says next stage of Poland Apache deal is close and Chinook may be next
Boeing has seen a renewed demand for the Apache attack helicopter with Poland and Australia becoming customers, while India, the UK, the US, the Netherlands and Egypt have also bought new aircraft or upgraded platforms.
-
Defence leaders call for strengthened supply chains and highlight security risks at Farnborough
Under mostly clear skies, a couple of showers and the roar of the newest variant of Boeing’s venerable F-15, there was a lot of talk at Farnborough International Airshow 2024 about how to make supply chains stronger in the face of high demands and a lingering post-Covid pandemic effect.
-
Greece joins the F-35 Lightning II world alliance
Greece has signed an offer for 20 F-35 aircraft with an option on 20 more platforms.