White House sought military strike against Iran
The White House demanded that the military draft plans for strikes on Iran after attacks in Iraq last year, sparking concern at the Pentagon and State Department, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.
The report said the move came after a mortar attack launched by an Iran-linked group on the Baghdad diplomatic quarters home to the US embassy in September. No one was hurt by the shells, which landed in an open lot.
But the White House National Security Council (NSC) sought to develop a forceful American response to the low-scale attack, including options for a strike against the Islamic republic, the Journal reported.
It added that the NSC also requested options to respond with strikes in Iraq and Syria.
‘It definitely rattled people,’ a former senior US administration official told the newspaper. ‘People were shocked. It was mind-boggling how cavalier they were about hitting Iran.’
Although the Department of Defense did develop proposals for a possible strike, the Journal said it was unclear whether they were shared with the White House.
In one NSC meeting, then deputy national security advisor Mira Ricardel called the attacks in Iraq an ‘act of war’ and called for a decisive US response.
Pentagon officials stressed that it was not unusual for the Defense Department to draw up military plans for the White House.
‘The Department of Defense is a planning organisation and provides the president military options for a variety of threats,’ Colonel Rob Manning, a Pentagon spokesman, told AFP.
He said the Pentagon's activities include ‘routinely reviewing and updating plans and activities to deal with a host of threats, including those posed by Iran, to deter and, if necessary, to respond to aggression.’
Asked about the report during his Middle East trip, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declined comment.
After the attack in Baghdad, the White House warned that ‘the United States will hold the regime in Tehran accountable for any attack that results in injury to our personnel or damage to United States government facilities.’
‘America will respond swiftly and decisively in defence of American lives,’ it added.
National Security Advisor John Bolton, a known Iran hawk, has pressed for regime change in the Islamic republic.
He penned a 2015 New York Times opinion piece prior to his current role titled ‘To stop Iran's bomb, bomb Iran.’
More from Defence Notes
-
Top-level commitments but no meat in UK Defence Industrial Strategy’s Statement of Intent
The initial document focused more on creating the right partnerships and inspiring investment in defence than on any details of how future UK Armed Forces would be armed.
-
UK begins process on new industrial strategy
The first stage of developing a new UK Defence Industrial Strategy has highlighted failings in current structures with solutions expected to be proposed in next year’s full strategy.
-
Romanians put pro-Russian candidate into presidential runoff even as the government spends west
Romania joined NATO more than two decades ago and the country is vital to the alliance’s geographic reach and its ability to supply Ukraine with weapons.
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.