What has the US learned from the Ukraine war about missile defence?
Improvements in the production of munitions are planned by the US DoD. (Photo: MDA)
Recent developments in the war in Ukraine have highlighted the relevance of advanced missile defence capabilities for tomorrow’s warfare. In order to equip its troops with the right equipment to succeed, the US has been learning and applying lessons from this conflict.
Congressmen and high-ranking Pentagon officials have been pointing out the measures to be taken to enhance the country’s missile defence.
This includes upgrading systems and accelerating both acquisition of new sensors and technologies and their integration with the DoD’s equipment in addition to improving the procurement process.
The massive Russian strikes on Ukrainian critical infrastructure using cruise
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
UK Chancellor commits £2 billion to make the country a “defence industrial superpower”
Rachel Reeves announced port upgrades, protected budgets for innovation and investment in novel technologies.
-
Launch of Gilat Defense targets DoD market
The communications company Gilat launched its new Gilat Defense division at the Satellite 2025 expo, with future solutions aimed at US military customers.
-
Collins MAPS Gen II to equip US DoD watercraft
US services have already conducted multiple tests with military maritime systems fitted with the system.
-
OCCAR expects substantial boost in programme numbers “in the coming months”
Europe’s Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR) “has to establish itself…as a centre of excellence for cooperative Defence Equipment Programmes” in the face of growing threats and the need for rearmament, according to the organisation’s chairman.
-
MBDA CEO emphasises “moment of truth” for Europe as company sees €37 billion backlog
MBDA CEO Éric Béranger stressed the company’s role supporting European countries with complex weapon systems and focused on boosting production against the backdrop of “shifting” geopolitical alliances.