Western air strikes in Syria illegal: German parliament experts
The air strikes unleashed in Syria by Western allies in mid-April were a violation of international law, jurists at the German parliament said in a report 20 April.
'The use of military force against a state, as a sanction against the violation of an international convention by this state, is an infringement of the prohibition of the use of violence in international law,' said the Bundestag experts in a reply to a question filed by the far-left Die Linke party.
The Bundestag experts referred in particular to the UN declaration from their 1970 general assembly which stresses 'the duty of States to refrain in their international relations from military, political, economic or any other form of coercion aimed against the political independence or territorial integrity of any State'.
The UN Security Council had also rejected armed retaliation, calling it 'incompatible with the objectives and the principles' of the United Nations.
The legal motive put forward by the UK, which joined in the air strikes alongside the US and France, was also 'not convincing' according to the Bundestag experts.
London said it was 'both right and legal' to launch strikes to alleviate humanitarian suffering.
But the experts said there were questions over 'whether the military attacks are really appropriate to prevent further suffering' in Syria.
On 14 April, the US, UK and France fired missiles meant as a response to what the trio of nations said was evidence Damascus had used chemical weapons a week earlier.
Purported footage of victims foaming at the mouth after the 7 April attack sparked an outcry and prompted the West to launch its biggest military action yet against Assad's regime.
But the military action was carried out without the approval of the UN Security Council, where Assad's ally Russia has a permanent seat and veto.
Germany did not join in the air strikes but Chancellor Angela Merkel called the military action 'necessary and appropriate'.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration]()
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
![RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific]()
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
![Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard]()
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
![UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?]()
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
![UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review]()
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
![US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities]()
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.
