US senator says Libya shipments could end UAE arms sales
A Democratic senator warned 2 July that the United States could cut off arms sales to the UAE if proven that it shipped US missiles to Libyan rebels, as the US ally denied it was involved.
In a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Robert Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, demanded an investigation and asked for explanations by 15 July on arms agreements with the UAE.
‘You are surely aware that if these allegations prove true you may be obligated by law to terminate all arms sales to the UAE,’ Menendez said.
He warned that the transfer would be a ‘serious violation’ of US law and ‘almost certainly’ break the UN arms embargo on Libya.
The New York Times reported on 28 June that forces loyal to Libya's unity government had discovered four Javelin missiles at a base used by men under the command of Khalifa Haftar, who has waged a months-long offensive to take Tripoli.
The newspaper said that markings on the US-made missiles indicated they had been sold to the UAE in 2008.
The UAE foreign ministry on 1 July said it was committed to the UN resolutions on the arms embargo and said it was ‘denying the ownership of weapons found in Libya.’
‘The UAE also urges all parties to de-escalate tensions and to re-engage in the UN's political process,’ it said in a statement.
The US State Department earlier said that it took allegations of misuse of US weapons seriously and was seeking answers.
Menendez told Pompeo that the alleged arms transfer to Libya was ‘particularly alarming’ as it came shortly after President Donald Trump's administration bypassed Congress to approve $8.1 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Lawmakers fear that the weapons will be used to kill civilians in Yemen, where millions are on the brink of starvation and schools and hospitals have been hit in a Saudi and Emirati offensive.
Pompeo said that the sale was an emergency because of tensions with Iran, which backs Yemen's Houthi rebels.
Democratic senators and a handful of Republicans last month voted to block the sale but they did not have enough votes to override a veto by Trump.
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.