US denies report it is leaving up to 1,000 troops in Syria
The US strongly denied a report that it intended to leave almost 1,000 troops in Syria, adding plans for a residual force of around 200 troops had not changed.
The Wall Street Journal had reported on 17 March that as talks with Turkey, US-backed Kurdish forces and European allies have failed to produce a deal on a ‘safe zone’ in north-eastern Syria, the US now intended to keep working with Kurdish fighters in the country.
It quoted US officials as saying the plan could see up to 1,000 US forces spread across the country.
‘A claim reported this evening by a major U.S. newspaper that the US military is developing plans to keep nearly 1,000 U.S. troops in Syria is factually incorrect,’ General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a statement. ‘There has been no change to the plan announced in February and we continue to implement the President's direction to draw down U.S. forces to a residual presence.’
But he added the US was continuing to ‘conduct detailed military planning with the Turkish General Staff to address Turkish security concerns along the Turkey-Syria border.’
‘Planning to date has been productive and we have an initial concept that will be refined in the coming days,’ he said. ‘We are also conducting planning with other members of the Coalition who have indicated an intent to support the transition phase of operations into Syria.’
President Donald Trump had abruptly announced in December 2018 the immediate and complete withdrawal of the 2,000 US troops deployed in north-eastern Syria, declaring victory against the Islamic State group. The decision prompted his defence secretary Jim Mattis to quit.
Then, under pressure from Congress and the Pentagon, he agreed to leave a residual force of some 200 US troops, which he wants to be reinforced by allies in the anti-IS coalition.
An objective of the international force is to guarantee the security of its Syrian Kurd allies. Turkey, a NATO member, views the Kurdish combatants as terrorists, and the Europeans fear they would be vulnerable if Ankara launched an offensive.
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.