US denies report it is leaving up to 1,000 troops in Syria
The US strongly denied a report that it intended to leave almost 1,000 troops in Syria, adding plans for a residual force of around 200 troops had not changed.
The Wall Street Journal had reported on 17 March that as talks with Turkey, US-backed Kurdish forces and European allies have failed to produce a deal on a ‘safe zone’ in north-eastern Syria, the US now intended to keep working with Kurdish fighters in the country.
It quoted US officials as saying the plan could see up to 1,000 US forces spread across the country.
‘A claim reported this evening by a major U.S. newspaper that the US military is developing plans to keep nearly 1,000 U.S. troops in Syria is factually incorrect,’ General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a statement. ‘There has been no change to the plan announced in February and we continue to implement the President's direction to draw down U.S. forces to a residual presence.’
But he added the US was continuing to ‘conduct detailed military planning with the Turkish General Staff to address Turkish security concerns along the Turkey-Syria border.’
‘Planning to date has been productive and we have an initial concept that will be refined in the coming days,’ he said. ‘We are also conducting planning with other members of the Coalition who have indicated an intent to support the transition phase of operations into Syria.’
President Donald Trump had abruptly announced in December 2018 the immediate and complete withdrawal of the 2,000 US troops deployed in north-eastern Syria, declaring victory against the Islamic State group. The decision prompted his defence secretary Jim Mattis to quit.
Then, under pressure from Congress and the Pentagon, he agreed to leave a residual force of some 200 US troops, which he wants to be reinforced by allies in the anti-IS coalition.
An objective of the international force is to guarantee the security of its Syrian Kurd allies. Turkey, a NATO member, views the Kurdish combatants as terrorists, and the Europeans fear they would be vulnerable if Ankara launched an offensive.
More from Defence Notes
-
What does the US decision to pause Ukraine support mean for the war and the stock markets?
NATO and other Western countries had been singing from the same song sheet since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia three years ago but the alliance has been weakened as the new US administration under President Donald Trump pauses military aid to Ukraine.
-
Ireland begins work on buying fighter jets and doubling the naval fleet
Since the release of Ireland’s Commission on the Defence Forces (CoDF) report two years ago there have been whisperings about the potential of Ireland buying fighter jets, one of the most ambitious recommendations. The prospect has now inched closer.
-
UK defence budget increased to 2.5% by 2027 as geopolitical landscape darkens
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer raises defence spending, while both NATO and President Trump demand significant further increases.
-
Ukraine leads the way on battlefield use of directed energy weapons
Increased drone use in Ukraine and in Middle Eastern conflicts has created a strong impetus to develop laser and radio-frequency firepower as exploration of direct-energy technology intensifies.
-
Saudi Arabia eyes large procurement spend as it boosts 2025 defence budget to $78 billion
The new figure is an increase from US$75.8 billion in 2024 and showcases the country’s focus on its Saudi Vision 2030 to achieve a diversified and sustainable economy, reducing the Kingdom’s dependency on oil.