It will come as a surprise to no-one, but the UK Government’s approach to mapping threats to national security is ‘flawed’.
Judging by the evidence of the UK and its response – along with equally static allies – to events in Ukraine and the Middle East, there is a serious problem here.
A report on the upcoming Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) from the House of Commons Defence Committee has criticised the government’s ‘tiered’ method of threat assessment as flawed ‘in assuming that the probability of potential threats becoming actual ones can reliably be predicted’.
The method used in
Already have an account? Log in
Get access to this article with a Free Basic Account
Access to all our premium news as a Premium News 365 Member. Corporate subscriptions available.
The initial document focused more on creating the right partnerships and inspiring investment in defence than on any details of how future UK Armed Forces would be armed.
The first stage of developing a new UK Defence Industrial Strategy has highlighted failings in current structures with solutions expected to be proposed in next year’s full strategy.
Romania joined NATO more than two decades ago and the country is vital to the alliance’s geographic reach and its ability to supply Ukraine with weapons.
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
Connect with us on socials
