UK Parliament told that Europe needs to do more within NATO and undertake reforms
Training of Ukraine soldiers, seen here taking place on Salisbury Plain, is one of the supporting roles provided by the UK. (UK MoD/Crown Copyright)
The UK and European Union (EU) countries within NATO need to take on more of the alliance’s responsibility and European industry needs to produce “more bang for the buck”, according to speakers who addressed the UK Parliament’s House of Lords European Affairs Committee on 4 March.
Attention was paid to how countries not part of what UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called “a coalition of the willing” could support an operation in Ukraine when a peace deal is eventually brokered. It was mentioned that operations in Libya in the 2010s were an example of how countries could support operations from
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
UK Chancellor commits £2 billion to make the country a “defence industrial superpower”
Rachel Reeves announced port upgrades, protected budgets for innovation and investment in novel technologies.
-
Launch of Gilat Defense targets DoD market
The communications company Gilat launched its new Gilat Defense division at the Satellite 2025 expo, with future solutions aimed at US military customers.
-
Collins MAPS Gen II to equip US DoD watercraft
US services have already conducted multiple tests with military maritime systems fitted with the system.
-
OCCAR expects substantial boost in programme numbers “in the coming months”
Europe’s Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR) “has to establish itself…as a centre of excellence for cooperative Defence Equipment Programmes” in the face of growing threats and the need for rearmament, according to the organisation’s chairman.
-
MBDA CEO emphasises “moment of truth” for Europe as company sees €37 billion backlog
MBDA CEO Éric Béranger stressed the company’s role supporting European countries with complex weapon systems and focused on boosting production against the backdrop of “shifting” geopolitical alliances.