Trump forces NATO allies to boost defence spending
US President Donald Trump said NATO countries had agreed to increase their defence spending after he forced crisis talks over his mounting demands at a fractious summit in Brussels.
Trump said there had been ‘tremendous progress’ after his ‘firm’ warnings during the tense two-day meeting in Brussels, during which he singled out Germany for special criticism.
Trump said in a freewheeling press conference: ‘I let them know I was extremely unhappy with what was happening and they have substantially upped their commitment and now we're very happy and have a very, very powerful, very very strong NATO, much stronger than it was two days ago.
‘Tremendous progress has been made, everyone's agreed to substantially up their commitment they're going to up it at levels they've never thought of before. It's been amazing to see the level of spirit in that room.’
French President Emmanuel Macron, who has cosied up to Trump despite their wide political differences, said NATO was ‘much stronger’ after the summit.
Trump threw the summit into turmoil by demanding not only that allies reach their commitment to increase spending to 2% of GDP ‘immediately’ – instead of by 2024 as previously agreed – but also telling them to eventually double the figure to a punishing 4%.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called an emergency session of all 29 allies to address Trump's demands, and the US leader said his hectoring had paid off.
Stoltenberg said: ‘The commitment was at 2% and that'll be going up quite a bit higher than that.’
After an opening day of summit talks marked by clashes between Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, NATO leaders had hoped to focus on policy on Ukraine and Afghanistan.
But just days out from a high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, the mercurial US leader threatened to throw the transatlantic alliance into disarray.
With allies fearing he could strike some sort of deal with NATO's key adversary, Trump said that he saw Putin as a ‘competitor’ but not an ‘enemy’.
Trump insisted that he would bring up key subjects including Syria, although he once again failed to rule out recognising Russia's annexation of Crimea.
He also vowed to raise allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election, amid an ongoing US investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow.
Trump himself accused Germany of being a ‘captive’ of Russia due to a multi-billion-dollar pipeline deal, complaining that Germany and other NATO allies ‘pay only a fraction’ of the cost of defending Europe.
Trump had explicitly linked NATO with a transatlantic trade row by saying the EU shut out US business while expecting America to defend it, singling out Germany for particular criticism.
Trump tweeted on 12 July morning before the second day of talks: ‘Germany just started paying Russia, the country they want protection from, Billions of Dollars for their Energy needs coming out of a new pipeline from Russia. Not acceptable! All NATO Nations must meet their 2% commitment, and that must ultimately go to 4%!"
Apart from the US, only three NATO countries hit the 2% target in 2017 – Britain, Greece and Estonia – but four more are expected to clear the threshold in 2018.
Trump has said his meeting with Putin in the week of 16 July ‘may be the easiest’ part of his European tour.
Trump heads to Britain on 12 July, where the government is in crisis over Brexit and where tensions with Russia have spiked after London blamed Moscow for the death of a British woman in July 2018 from contact with the Novichok nerve agent.
Trump poured fuel on the Brexit fire just hours before he was due to land there, saying he was not sure that Britons had voted for the Brexit plan presented by Prime Minister Theresa May, which has triggered a British cabinet rebellion.
Trump told a press conference in Brussels on 12 July: ‘The people voted to break it up (Britain's ties with the EU). So I would imagine that's what they will do, but maybe they will take a little bit of a different route. I don't know that is what they voted for.’
More from Defence Notes
-
Top-level commitments but no meat in UK Defence Industrial Strategy’s Statement of Intent
The initial document focused more on creating the right partnerships and inspiring investment in defence than on any details of how future UK Armed Forces would be armed.
-
UK begins process on new industrial strategy
The first stage of developing a new UK Defence Industrial Strategy has highlighted failings in current structures with solutions expected to be proposed in next year’s full strategy.
-
Romanians put pro-Russian candidate into presidential runoff even as the government spends west
Romania joined NATO more than two decades ago and the country is vital to the alliance’s geographic reach and its ability to supply Ukraine with weapons.
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.