Trump blasts Montenegro, questions NATO mutual defence
Days after a widely slammed summit with his Russian counterpart, US President Donald Trump drew fresh scorn on 18 July for questioning NATO's undergirding principle and for attacking ‘tiny’ Montenegro, whose accession to the alliance enraged Moscow.
Trump's comments, which a former US ambassador to NATO decried as a ‘gift to Putin,’ came in an interview with Fox News when he was asked about Article 5, NATO's common defence clause which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
Fox host Tucker Carlson asked: ‘Why should my son go to Montenegro to defend it from attack?’
Trump responded: ‘I understand what you're saying. I've asked the same question. Montenegro is a tiny country with very strong people... They're very aggressive people. They may get aggressive, and congratulations, you're in World War III.’
Montenegro, a former Yugoslav republic with a population of about 630,000, joined NATO in 2017, becoming is 29th member. Its military only numbers about 2,000 personnel.
Montenegrin Prime Minister Dusko Markovic said Trump's comment was ‘not in the context of justification of NATO's existence, but of NATO funding.’
Markovic told parliament late on 18 July in the capital Podgorica: ‘He replied to the question in which he said that the Montenegrin people are brave and that he does not want citizens of the US to fight and get killed for other NATO members states.’
The only time Article 5 was ever invoked was by America after the 11 September 2001 terror attacks conducted by al-Qaeda.
Nearly 17 years on, NATO troops are still operating in Afghanistan after the US-led invasion seeking retribution for the nation's harbouring of the terror group.
Nicholas Burns, who was US ambassador to NATO after the 9/11 attacks, wrote on Twitter: ‘Trump sows further doubt whether the US under his leadership would defend our allies. Another gift to Putin.’
Senior Republican leader Senator John McCain, who has called the summit with President Vladimir Putin on 16 July in Helsinki a ‘tragic mistake,’ said Trump was doing exactly what the Russian strongman wanted.
McCain said on Twitter: ‘The people of #Montenegro boldly withstood pressure from #Putin's Russia to embrace democracy. The Senate voted 97-2 supporting its accession to #NATO. By attacking Montenegro & questioning our obligations under NATO, the President is playing right into Putin's hands.’
But US State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said Trump has been unequivocal in his support of NATO's collective defence.
Nauert told reporters: ‘The summit declaration that came out at the end of the summit stated clearly that any attack against one ally would be regarded as an attack against all.’
Montenegro's relations with Russia have deteriorated in recent years as the Balkan nation moved to join NATO. It also hopes to join the European Union, much to the dismay of Putin, who sees the West perennially creeping toward Russia.
Moscow has been accused of meddling in Montenegro's elections, and a failed 2016 coup was allegedly planned by pro-Russian militants.
Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, called Trump's remarks ‘extraordinary.’
Haass wrote on Twitter: ‘It is not just that the president throws Montenegro under the bus; he makes the US commitment to NATO conditional and makes clear his discomfort w Article 5 and collective security, the core of the alliance.’
With such a small military, it is difficult to know what Trump was referring to when he called Montenegro's people ‘very aggressive.’
The Pentagon did not immediately comment.
Some observers derided Trump's claim that Montenegro is aggressive, re-circulating online a video of 2017’s NATO summit where the US president appeared to shove Montenegro's prime minister aside at a photo shoot.
Doug Bandow, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said Trump's comments more likely reflected his anger at NATO than any particular Russian concerns about Montenegro.
Trump has repeatedly railed against NATO, accusing its members of not doing enough to fund their militaries and an over-reliance on America.
Bandow told AFP: ‘It raises a proper question, which is has NATO become kind of a welfare agency as opposed to a security agency. I don't quite understand the notion that the Montenegrins are so aggressive and with their two thousand men military that are likely to start World War III.’
Bandow noted that Montenegro joined NATO on Trump's watch.
Bandow said: ‘This president allowed that to move forward last year. So if you allow it to happen, why are you complaining about it?’
John Hannah, senior counsellor for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and former national security advisor to vice president Dick Cheney, noted that Trump bridles at NATO because he considers it as multilateralism at its worst.
Hannah told AFP that the idea that a small country like Montenegro ‘could do something that might anger or upset a neighbouring great power like Russia and automatically draw the US into a major war runs counter to all Trump's instincts. That's not 'America First' in his eyes. It's the opposite. It's America being played for a sucker.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.