South Sudan looks to foreign powers for peace deal funding
South Sudan has called on the international community to fund efforts to implement a peace deal, which is already four months behind schedule due to lack of money.
In an address to diplomats, deputy foreign minister Deng Dau Deng said the money was needed to move warring forces into cantonment areas, a move seen as vital to addressing security in the country.
"Our specific appeal is for our partners and for the diplomatic community in Juba to give support to plug the gaps... so that we can move," Deng said.
Goc Mokwach, deputy finance minister, told AFP that parliament last year approved estimated spending of $20 million to implement the peace deal, however an overall budget has not been announced.
But Deng said the government only had $1.6 million for peace efforts.
"If you don't have resources, you cannot move," he said. "It is availability of the resources that will actually enhance the process itself."
From the fight for independence until it was achieved in 2011, foreign partners, especially the United States, have poured billions of dollars into the country.
Meanwhile investigations by the Enough Project advocacy group has shown how elites have looted government coffers to enrich themselves and fund the war.
Since the signing of the peace agreement, President Salva Kiir has made a series of foreign visits to South Africa, Egypt, and China, to lobby for resources, Deng said.
The peace agreement signed in September 2018 is the latest effort to end a nearly five year war that began when Kiir accused his former deputy, Riek Machar, of plotting a coup.
During the conflict, nearly 400,000 people died and millions were forced to flee their homes or to the brink of starvation.
But since the agreement was signed, diplomats say there has been a significant reduction in fighting, although pockets of fighting have continued between government forces and rebels who didn't sign the deal, especially in the Equatoria region.
Deng said the national pre-transitional committee, comprising representatives of the different parties to the agreement, have met six times and established five technical committees.
More from Defence Notes
-
Top-level commitments but no meat in UK Defence Industrial Strategy’s Statement of Intent
The initial document focused more on creating the right partnerships and inspiring investment in defence than on any details of how future UK Armed Forces would be armed.
-
UK begins process on new industrial strategy
The first stage of developing a new UK Defence Industrial Strategy has highlighted failings in current structures with solutions expected to be proposed in next year’s full strategy.
-
Romanians put pro-Russian candidate into presidential runoff even as the government spends west
Romania joined NATO more than two decades ago and the country is vital to the alliance’s geographic reach and its ability to supply Ukraine with weapons.
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.