South Korea court offers conscientious objectors options
South Korea's Constitutional Court on 28 June upheld the jailing of those who evade the country's military conscription law, but ordered authorities to provide conscientious objectors with an alternative form of national service.
Almost 65 years after the end of the Korean War, nearly every able-bodied South Korean man between the ages of 18 and 35 must still complete around two years of military service.
Anyone refusing the call-up usually ends up in prison for 18 months, and with no alternative community service option some 19,000 conscientious objectors have been jailed since 1950, most of them Jehovah's Witnesses.
In a split decision, the court's nine judges upheld a provision in the current conscription law under which draft dodgers can be punished with up to three years in prison.
The court said in its decision: ‘It is legitimate to enforce military duty through criminal punishment.’
But it ruled that another phrase in the conscription law that does not recognise any alternative to military service is in breach of the constitution.
In a statement, the defence ministry said that it had been considering alternatives to military service, and ‘will decide on a policy at the earliest possible date in line with the Court decision.’
South Korea's armed forces rely heavily on conscription and military service often involves postings to front-line positions on the border with North Korea.
In May 2010, a North Korean submarine torpedoed the South Korean naval vessel Cheonan, killing 46 sailors including 16 who were on military service.
In November 2010, the North shelled a South Korean border island, killing two marines – both of them young conscripts.
But tensions with Pyongyang have drastically eased in 2018, with the North scaling back confrontation over its nuclear arsenal and holding summits with the South and the US, and calls for alternative forms of service have been on the rise.
In several previous cases the country's top courts have backed conscription, but 28 June’s verdict followed appeals from 28 objectors against the law, who cited the freedom of conscience guaranteed in the constitution.
Some 200 objectors are currently serving prison terms and 883 others have cases pending at various levels in the legal system – a number which has grown rapidly in recent months as judges delayed decisions, waiting for the Constitutional Court to rule.
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.