Romania minister under fire over 'ballistic' gaffe
Romania's defence minister on 1 August faced calls to resign after he said the US missile defence system in the south had ballistic missiles, apparently confirming Russian concerns of a security threat near its border.
Romanian Defence Minister Mihai Fifor, during a live interview with a local television station on 31 July, said: ‘How could president (Vladimir) Putin be thrilled that we have the military base at Deveselu with ballistic missiles.’
Fifor later blamed ‘a misunderstanding or an error of communication.’
Fifor told another news channel: ‘No one could ever say that there are ballistic missiles at Deveselu. I said that the base is a defence against ballistic missiles, not that it has any of them.’
Russia sees the missile shield as a security threat on its doorstep, despite the US and NATO insisting it is not aimed at undermining Moscow's defences.
According to NATO, the shield is a purely defensive system equipped with interceptors, which can protect NATO members against short- and medium-range ballistic missiles.
Romania's main opposition parties, the National Liberal Party and the Save Romania Union, have called on Fifor to quit. Former president Traian Basescu of the People's Movement Party also condemned Fifor.
Basescu wrote on Facebook: ‘Mihai Fifor has no place in the government... He confirmed statements made by Putin and other officials who try to undermine the reality, which is that Deveselu is a defensive missile system, not on offensive one.’
Fifor's comments follow two other gaffes.
Romanian Prime Minister Viorica Dancila declared in the week of 23 July that she was ‘happy to be in Pristina’ while visiting Montenegro's capital Podgorica. Pristina is the capital of Kosovo, which Romania does not recognise.
And Romania's agriculture minister apologised in the week of 23 July for having compared the incineration of dead pigs infected with African swine fever to the Auschwitz concentration camp.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration]()
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
![RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific]()
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
![Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard]()
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
![UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?]()
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
![UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review]()
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
![US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities]()
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.
