Pentagon still backs Iran nuclear deal, says official
The Iranian nuclear deal is still in the best interests of the US, a senior Pentagon official said 13 March, going against President Donald Trump's claim that it is a ‘terrible’ agreement.
US Central Command Chief General Joseph Votel told a Senate panel he shared the views of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joe Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Votel said: ‘From my perspective, the JCPOA addresses one of the principal threats that we deal with from Iran.
‘So, if the JCPOA goes away, then we will have to have another way to deal with the nuclear weapons programme.’
Trump is threatening to scrap the international agreement unless tough new restrictions were placed on Iran before 12 May.
He cited disagreements on the issue as a reason for his decision to fire on 13 March his Diplomatic Chief Rex Tillerson and replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who is considered hawkish.
The president is concerned that parts of the deal start to expire from 2026 and that it fails to address Iran's missile programme, its regional activities or its human rights abuses.
A US exit could kill the nuclear pact, which the Islamic republic has refused to re-negotiate.
Struck in 2015, it was signed by Iran with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Germany.
Under the agreement, Iran agreed to freeze its nuclear programme in return for the lifting of punishing international sanctions.
While Iran has reaped massive economic benefits from the accord, notably by being able to resume oil exports, it is still constrained by US sanctions in other areas.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration]()
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
![RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific]()
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
![Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard]()
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
![UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?]()
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
![UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review]()
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
![US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities]()
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.
