Not seeking Cold War with Russia, says NATO chief
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on 16 March that the alliance did not want a return to Cold War hostilities with Russia while expressing support for Britain's strong stance on the nerve agent attack.
He said the targeting of former double agent Sergei Skripal fit a ‘pattern of reckless behaviour’ to which the US-led military alliance had responded, but insisted political dialogue must also continue.
Stoltenberg told BBC radio: ‘We do not want a new Cold War, we do not want a new arms race, Russia is our neighbour therefore we have to continue to strive for an improved better relationship with Russia.’
He noted that NATO allies have in recent years imposed economic sanctions on Russia and deployed more troops in eastern Europe in response to the ‘changed security situation’.
But he stressed: ‘To isolate Russia is not an alternative.’
He added: ‘At some point Russia will understand that it is in its interests not to confront us but to cooperate with us, and we are ready to do so if they respect some basic norms and rules for international behaviour.’
NATO has backed Britain following the 4 March attack in the southwestern English city of Salisbury, which left Skripal and his daughter Yulia in a critical condition.
Stoltenberg said: ‘We have no reason to doubt the findings and assessments made by the British government, not least because this takes place at the backdrop of a pattern of reckless behaviour by Russia over many years.’
British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson on 16 March stressed the government's ‘quarrel’ was with Russian President Vladimir Putin rather than the Russian people.
Johnson, during a museum visit in west London alongside his Polish counterpart Jacek Czaputowicz, said: ‘Our quarrel is with Putin's Kremlin, and with his decision, and we think it overwhelmingly likely that it was his decision to direct the use of a nerve agent on the streets of the UK, on the streets of Europe, for the first time since the Second World War. That is why we are at odds with Russia.’
Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn, who has questioned whether the Russian state was responsible for the attack, warned on 16 March against a ‘drift to conflict’.
Writing in The Guardian, the Labour leader said ‘a connection to Russian mafia-like groups that have been allowed to gain a toehold in Britain cannot be excluded.’
He said: ‘To rush way ahead of the evidence being gathered by the police, in a fevered parliamentary atmosphere, serves neither justice nor our national security.’
Corbyn's leftwing views have in the past drawn criticism of many of his own MPs, and several among them have defied him to back the Conservative government's position.
By 16 March morning, 33 Labour MPs had signed a parliamentary motion blaming the Russian state ‘unequivocally’.
Corbyn wrote that Labour was ‘no supporter of the Putin regime’, but added: ‘That does not mean we should resign ourselves to a 'new Cold War' of escalating arms spending, proxy conflicts across the globe and a McCarthyite intolerance of dissent.’
More from Defence Notes
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.