NATO should adopt hybrid warfare trigger: Special Rapporteur
NATO states should modify the alliance's Article 5 collective defence provision to trigger a response in the event of so-called ‘hybrid warfare’ attacks, a conservative British lawmaker said in a special report on 27 May.
NATO allies have accused Russia of using hybrid warfare techniques, including subversion, propaganda and cyber warfare, to undermine the West without triggering a full NATO military response.
In his special report on countering Russia's hybrid threats, Britain's Lord Jopling told lawmakers meeting at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in Warsaw that the alliance should consider a new collective defence ‘Article 5B’.
The British lawmaker said in his report: ‘The article would make clear that hybrid attacks would trigger a collective response from the Alliance. The Rapporteur is convinced that the Allied leaders should, possibly at the upcoming summit in July 2018, initiate the drafting of the Alliance's new Strategic Concept to reflect new global security realities, including the rise of hybrid threats.’
NATO lawmakers are expected to vote on whether to accept his recommendation at the closing session of the assembly on 28 May.
In March 2018, Gen Curtis Scaparrotti, the US commander of NATO forces in Europe, said that NATO countries were working to determine when a cyber attack would trigger the alliance's Article 5 collective defence provision.
NATO leaders have agreed that a cyber attack against a member state could trigger Article 5, and reaching a specific understanding on the issue would allow ‘greater agility, greater flexibility in determining how to respond,’ he told a US Senate committee.
The alliance ‘recognises the difficulty in indirect or asymmetric activity that Russia is practising, activities below the level of conflict,’ Scaparrotti said.
NATO will hold its next summit on 11 and 12 July in Brussels, with the fight against terrorism and the growing threat from Russia in the areas of hybrid and cyber warfare expected to be high on the agenda.
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.