NATO planning for more Russian missiles
NATO is planning for ‘more Russian missiles’ after the collapse of a landmark Cold War arms treaty, but will not deploy new nuclear warheads in Europe, the organisation's chief said 12 February 2019.
Fears are growing of a new arms race in Europe after Washington started the process of exiting the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty claiming that Russia violated the pact with a new missile system.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance would beef up its defences but insisted this did not mean ‘mirroring’ any Russian build-up of missiles.
The fate of the INF treaty, signed by the US and the Soviet Union in 1987 to ban ground-launched mid-range missiles, will be high on the agenda as NATO defence ministers meet in Brussels on 13 February.
Western capitals want Russia to return to compliance with the treaty by abandoning its new 9M729 missile system.
‘We are both urging Russia to come back in compliance but at the same time we are planning for a world without the INF treaty and with more Russian missiles,’ Stoltenberg said. ‘We don't have to mirror what Russia does but we need to make sure we have effective deterrence and defence.’
Stoltenberg repeated warnings that the new Russian missiles made nuclear conflict more likely because they are mobile, hard to detect, and give little warning time.
The US Ambassador to NATO, Kay Bailey Hutchison, said the Pentagon has already started looking at how best to defend against the new missiles. ‘America felt it was time for us to have a defence and not be left without a defence with Russia having missiles that were in violation,’ she said. ‘What is going to happen going forward? First of all, the defence we would be working on is conventional, not nuclear.’
The INF treaty banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500km (310 to 3,400 miles), ending a dangerous build-up of warheads on mainland Europe.
Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to the US pullout by saying Moscow would also leave the treaty, and his defence minister announced plans for new missiles - prompting Trump to vow to outspend Moscow.
While pointing the finger at each other, both Washington and the Kremlin have voiced concern that the bilateral INF treaty does nothing to constrain China, whose rapidly growing military relies on medium-range missiles as a core part of its defence strategy.
More from Defence Notes
-
Top-level commitments but no meat in UK Defence Industrial Strategy’s Statement of Intent
The initial document focused more on creating the right partnerships and inspiring investment in defence than on any details of how future UK Armed Forces would be armed.
-
UK begins process on new industrial strategy
The first stage of developing a new UK Defence Industrial Strategy has highlighted failings in current structures with solutions expected to be proposed in next year’s full strategy.
-
Romanians put pro-Russian candidate into presidential runoff even as the government spends west
Romania joined NATO more than two decades ago and the country is vital to the alliance’s geographic reach and its ability to supply Ukraine with weapons.
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.