NATO expels seven Russian diplomats
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said on 27 March that the alliance was expelling seven Russian diplomats to show that Moscow faces ‘costs and consequences’ over a nerve agent attack on a former spy in Britain.
Stoltenberg announced the maximum size of the Russian mission to NATO would also be slashed by a third, from 30 to 20, as part of international measures to punish Russia over the poisoning of Sergei Skripal.
Stoltenberg said: ‘I have today withdrawn the accreditation of seven staff of the Russian mission to NATO. I will also deny the pending accreditation request for three others.
‘This sends a clear message to Russia that there are costs and consequences for its unacceptable and dangerous pattern of behaviour.’
The moves pile yet more pressure on Moscow after two dozen countries around the world united in mass expulsions of Russian diplomats over the attempted assassination of Russian double agent Skripal and his daughter Yulia with a nerve agent in the English city of Salisbury on 4 March.
Britain has said the Skripals were poisoned with the Soviet-developed nerve agent ‘Novichok’, though Russia has denied involvement.
Stoltenberg said Russia had ‘underestimated the unity of NATO allies’, adding that the mass expulsions would have a material impact on Russian operations.
Stoltenberg said: ‘The practical implication is that Russia will have a reduced capability to do intelligence work in NATO countries and in those countries they are expelled from.’
But Stoltenberg, who said earlier in March 2018 that he did not want a new Cold War with Moscow, said the alliance planned to continue its ‘dual-track approach of strong defence and openness to dialogue’ with Russia.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on 27 March accused Washington of applying ‘colossal pressure’ to achieve the massive, coordinated international response to the poisoning.
A number of countries including the US said the Russian diplomats they were throwing out were actually undeclared spies.
Relations between NATO and Russia were already at a low ebb over Moscow's annexation of Crimea and its role in the Ukraine and Syria conflicts.
More from Defence Notes
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.