France questions if US support for NATO is 'perennial'
France's defence minister questioned on 18 March 2019 whether the US commitment to the NATO alliance is ‘perennial’ and said Europe needs to build defence ‘autonomy’ as that question goes unanswered.
With Washington increasingly focused on the strategic challenge from China, Florence Parly said, ‘a question mark has emerged’ over the transatlantic alliance. Those posing the question would not be reassured, she said, ‘by the current atmosphere of withdrawal: withdrawal from battlefields, from treaties, from trade pacts.’
‘What Europeans are worried about is this: will the US commitment (to NATO) be perennial? Should we assume that it will go on as was the case in the past 70 years?’ Parly asked the Atlantic Council in Washington ahead of a meeting with Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan.
The minister said she was most concerned about President Donald Trump apparently tying the US commitment and Europe's readiness to spend more on defence, including buying more US defence equipment. ‘The alliance should be unconditional, otherwise it is not an alliance. NATO's solidarity clause is called Article V, not article F-35,’ she said, referring to the US fighter jet.
Parly conceded Trump's criticism that NATO's European members need to spend more on shared defense, but she said it would be good to build up a measure of autonomy so as not to overly depend on the US military. The Europeans ‘have started to look honestly at what they would be really able to do if left on their own,’ she said. ‘Building a European autonomy should never be seen as a move against the US. We want America solidly steeped in NATO. Autonomy should be a variation on friendship.’
‘Every time the US has retreated from Europe, threats have come back to haunt the US itself,’ she added.
Parly also gave support for the continued presence of US forces in Syria, and said France could take part - an issue she would be discussing with Shanahan. ‘Today, we are carefully studying the recent US offer to maintain a residual presence, in cooperation with a few partners,’ she said.
More from Defence Notes
-
What the future holds for Ukraine and NATO under a Trump administration
Although Trump’s geopolitics policy for Europe remains unclear, defence analysts from the US and Europe predict how his incoming administration would attempt to handle critical issues on the continent.
-
RUSI deputy: UK needs longer procurement plans and improved awareness of US sift to Indo-Pacific
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October was the first by a Labour government in 14 years which has also launched a review into defence procurement programmes.
-
Australia outlines longer punch and brings local industry onboard
The Australian government has placed a focus on Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance (GWEO) which has included the purchase of additional long-range rocket systems and investments in local production of missiles.
-
UK boosts defence budget by 5.3%, but is this enough?
The UK budget announced in Parliament on 30 October is the first by a Labour government in 14 years. While it sees a boost in defence spending, this comes in the face of fiscal challenges and the effects of inflation.
-
UK makes big moves to fix “broken” defence procurement system ahead of major review
The changes are intended to meet greater need and deliver more value for money.
-
US companies invest in production capabilities to satisfy DoD’s hunger for cutting-edge capabilities
BAE Systems, Booz Allen Hamilton and Lockheed Martin have been betting on new facilities and innovative manufacturing technologies to speed up the development of new solutions.