America's 'provocative' Korean military drills
US President Donald Trump's shock decision to suspend ‘war games’, announced after his summit with Kim Jong Un, has left allies scrabbling for a response and seemingly handed Pyongyang a major concession.
North Korea has long sought an end to joint military exercises between US and South Korean forces, condemning them as a rehearsal for invasion, and conducting its own counter-drills and missile tests in response.
Tensions with Pyongyang inevitably escalate during the drills, which Washington and Seoul have long insisted are ‘defensive’ in nature.
In a free-ranging press conference after his extraordinary summit with the young North Korean leader, Trump told reporters in Singapore he would end the ‘provocative’ joint exercises, aping language that Pyongyang has long employed.
Seoul and Tokyo appeared to have been caught off-guard by the announcement.
Japanese Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera said on 13 June the drills were ‘vital’ to regional security, and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo insisted that suspension of the drills was contingent on productive negotiations in ‘good faith’.
There is a precedent for stopping the drills. Joint exercises were halted in the 1990s during talks aimed at curbing Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions.
Here is a look at the main joint exercises:
Key Resolve is a computer-simulated war game conducted by military commanders which usually begins in March and runs for about 10 days.
It always accompanies Foal Eagle, one of the world's largest field drills.
More than 200,000 South Korean and some 30,000 US soldiers – including thousands flown in from abroad – participate in the two-month Foal Eagle exercises.
This year's drills were delayed to avoid clashing with the Pyeongchang Winter Games in South Korea.
Pyongyang sent athletes, cheerleaders and the North Korean leader's sister Kim Yo Jong to the Olympics, starting a diplomatic thaw that culminated in the recent US-North Korea summit.
Foal Eagle was cut short afterwards by a month to maintain the rapprochement.
Max Thunder is a massive air force drill that usually lasts two weeks.
In 2018, the two allies conducted Max Thunder in May, mobilising some 100 aircraft including advanced US F-22 fighter jets, which are feared by the North for their radar-avoiding and precision strike abilities.
Pyongyang strongly protested the drills, threatening to cancel its planned summit with the US and postponing a scheduled military meeting with Seoul.
This two-week drill usually starts in August and although it is largely a computerised command-and-control exercise, Pyongyang considers it a highly provocative rehearsal for invasion.
Following 2017's drills, the North fired ballistic missiles over Japan, triggering global alarm and a furious response from Tokyo.
More from Defence Notes
-
How Canada plans to “seize” the opportunity to increase investments in defence
The Canadian Department of National Defence has been increasing efforts to accelerate the acquisition of new equipment and modernise its in-service inventory.
-
Palantir and Boeing partner up to bring AI to defence manufacturing
The partnership with the US airframer will see Palantir’s AI software leveraged to help streamline data analytics across Boeing’s 12 factories on defence and classified programmes.
-
DroneShield to double its US footprint to meet growing demand for counter-UxS capabilities
DroneShield disclosed to Shephard its plans to increase its workforce and manufacturing capacities while strengthening partnerships with US suppliers.
-
Singapore’s DSTA seeks wider partnerships to advance robotics and AI capabilities
The technology organisation is expecting a significant rise in the number of staff working across robotics and digital solutions as it becomes more of a focal point.
-
Modular and attritable equipment must be a priority: US military
Senior officers and representatives from the US Army, US Air Force and US Navy emphasised the need to expedite acquisition projects for systems and platforms that are more modular. They also highlighted that the loss of equipment is acceptable.